Trump Cabinet Nominees

 

Trump Cabinet Nominees

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Marco Rubio, Secretary of State. Long track record of clear understanding of the new Axis of Evil.

Robert Lighthizer, TBD. Brilliant trade representative with a solid track record.

Mike Waltz, NSA.  Good track record of clear understanding of the new Axis of Evil. Strong pragmatic supporter of slaughtered Ukraine.

Scott Bessent, Treasury Secretary. Widely praised for his tough stance on global cheaters.

Doug Burgum, Interior Secretary. Principled and pragmatic governor.

John Ratcliffe, CIA Director. Widely praised from different segments of the political spectrum.


⭐⭐⭐⭐

Tom Homan, Border Czar.  Exceptionally tough on illegals. Probably the right person to reverse the massive southern border invasion.

Mike Huckabee, Ambassador to Israel. Articulate with conviction.

Elise Stefanik, UN ambassador. Probably the right person to deal with the corrupt, largely useless UN.

Peter Navarro, trade counselor. A bit crazy, but with an incisive understanding of the PRC, the head of the new Axis of Evil.  

⭐⭐⭐

Pete Hegseth, Defense Secretary. A womanizer, but maybe the right disruptor at the right time. 

Kristi Noem, Homeland Security Secretary. Somewhat pragmatic governor.


⭐⭐

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Health and Human Services Secretary. An environmental fanatic who has done tremendous damage to New England. Maybe good for disrupting some government agencies swamped by corporate lobbyists. 

Elon Musk, Vivek Ramaswamy, Department of Government Efficiency. Ruthless guys often misinformed. Maybe good for disrupting and trimming some government agencies.

⭐

David Sacks, White House A.I. and Crypto Czar. Delusional, ruthless, de facto Russian asset.


A threat to national security and world peace:

Tulsi Gabbard, Director of National Intelligence


A threat to democracy and the rule of law:

Matt Gaetz, Attorney General


I don't know much:

Pam Bondi, Attorney General.

Brendan Carr, FCC Chair

Doug Collins, VA Secretary

Lori Chavez-DeRemer, Labor Secretary: 

Sean Duffy, Transportation Secretary

Sebastian Gorka, Senior director for counterterrorism

Howard Lutnick, Commerce Secretary

Marty Makary, FDA Director

Bill McGinley, White House Counsel

Linda McMahon, Education Secretary

Stephen Miller, Deputy Chief of Staff for policy

Janette Nesheiwat, Suregon General

Kash Patel, FBI Director

Brooke Rollins, Agriculture Secretary

Will Scharf, White House staff secretary

Scott Turner, HUD Secretary

Russell Vought, OMB Director

Dave Weldon, CDC Director

Susie Wiles, WH Chief of Staff

Matthew Whitaker, Ambassador to NATO

Steven Witkoff, Middle East envoy

Alex Wong, Principal Deputy National Security Adviser

Chris Wright, Energy Secretary

Lee Zeldin, EPA Director




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Google's Local Guides program's policy enforcement is the worst

Image
Google's Local Guides program's policy enforcement is unbelievably bad. It is despicable. Here is what it does things sometimes: Publishes a review initially, then rejects it later without notifying the reviewer. Suspends the reviewer's Local Guides account because of the above rejected reviews without notifying the reviewer. They do this to users who have made thousands of contributions over the years benefiting millions of Google Maps users. Continues to allow a suspended account  The review rejections are done by their flawed AI. Reposting the review without any changes will get approved often.  Notifies a reviewer of a rejection without giving a specific reason. This is the worst part.  It seems that one may get these punishments by posting multiple reviews quickly. I have not seen any online policy enforcement nearly as bad as Google Local Guides'. Bing Maps is worth trying. For reviews, Tripadvisor may be a better place. My journey of  Local Guides: I have made...
Read more

COVID outcome may highly depend on viral exposure intensity.

Image
For a specific person, a virus infection tends to be thought to have a predetermined outcome.  For example, a young healthy person would be asymptomatic after Covid infection, and an old and sick person would die or be hospitalized.  This explains most observations generally speaking.  Since the start of the Covid 19 pandemic,  a tremendous amount of data has been accumulated easing the verification of our hypotheses. The aforementioned all-or-none model has difficulty in explaining some data. For example, both New York City and South Dakota experienced large Covid waves in 2020 albeit at different times.  They likely have 30-40% of their population infected. South Dakota's excess mortality (compared with 2019) is 23%, but the NYC's is 53%.  Demographic difference unlikely can fully explain this difference. The current north-south divide in the US in terms the ▲ infection cannot be attributed to vaccination rate difference alone because Florida has a higher...
Read more

US will be better regardless of election outcome

Image
Within 48 hours, probably 30M to 50M Americans will experience post-election stress disorder, many will attempt suicide and some will start to plan emigration. I will not. I actually look forward to it regardless of the winner.  Here is my glass-half-full thought:  To me, either T or H will be an upgrade to B. Here is why: If T wins, the southern border invasion concerning 96% of Americans will finally be stopped to allow us to focus on other important issues.  Deportation will accelerate to deter illegals but mass deportation costing over $100B/yr will not happen.  The main downside of T is primarily long-term. The US is such a mature democracy that T would need to rule for two or three decades to turn the US into Sinophile Orban's Hungary to control the media, and education institutions and merge the state with family business.  T's admiration of the dictators of the new axis of evil is nothing new. It has been the case since 2016 and he is very candid about i...
Read more