The inherent issues and corruption of the US health care sector as reflected by Ivermectin

A group of physicians from a reputable medical institution has just published their study of 3532 subjects showing Ivermectin PROPHYLAXIS reduces corona infection by 83%.

A paper on a randomized trial published by Lancet suggests EARLY TREATMENT of Ivermectin speeds up corona recoveryby 100%.

However, another study shows no significant symptom resolution time reduction.

Perhaps the earlier the better.

The FDA is against the use of Ivermectin for corona.  This is fully understandable because the FDA’s top priority is drug safety, not drug promotion.  They need rigorous clinical trials to approve the drug for a SPECIFIC indication.

A major manufacturer (Merck) is against it. They need to limit their liability.  Little incentive to seek approval through costly clinical trials due to the low drug price and abundant generics of Ivermectin.

Here is how the industry works.  If a $30 treatment is 70% effective and a $3K treatment is 75% for the same indication, the industry will focus on the latter in the name of helping patients to get the best treatment.

The only options I see for drugs like Ivermectin for corona are governments or non-profits sponsoring meticulous large-scale trials.

The newly formed powerful healthcare-test lab complex will rob this country for the foreseeable future by continuous massive tests most of which have little use.

The most effective and economical way of opening schools is by using proven virucidal UVC light hidden in HVAC systems made in the US.  Unfortunately, these manufacturers lack the lobbying power enjoyed by big pharma.

One possible solution is starting a people’s campaign to urge representatives to promote this.  Our freedom and collective financial wellbeing are at stake.  Massive money printing for wasting will bite sooner or later.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Google's Local Guides program's policy enforcement is the worst

Image
Google's Local Guides program's policy enforcement is unbelievably bad. It is despicable. Here is what it does things sometimes: Publishes a review initially, then rejects it later without notifying the reviewer. Suspends the reviewer's Local Guides account because of the above rejected reviews without notifying the reviewer. They do this to users who have made thousands of contributions over the years benefiting millions of Google Maps users. Continues to allow a suspended account  The review rejections are done by their flawed AI. Reposting the review without any changes will get approved often.  Notifies a reviewer of a rejection without giving a specific reason. This is the worst part.  It seems that one may get these punishments by posting multiple reviews quickly. I have not seen any online policy enforcement nearly as bad as Google Local Guides'. Bing Maps is worth trying. For reviews, Tripadvisor may be a better place. My journey of  Local Guides: I have made ov
Read more

PRC COVID mortality estimate: 3M - 5M

Image
Summary PRC COVID-induced excess deaths: Absolute minimum requiring a miracle: 1 M Likely minimum: 2.5 M Likely range: 3 M - 5 M How I derived these numbers: First, if you doubt the current high COVID fatalities based on anecdotes instead of official data, let's think in this way. People are paying what is equivalent to 2 - 3 months' salary to avoid unpredictable long waits at Beijing crematoria, so long waiting lines are common. Beijing has 12 crematoria and many more in its vicinity. If people could drive 100km or more to have timely cremation, they would not spend so much money to save the 1 or 2 hours of transportation.  If Beijing with the best healthcare resources has such a high fatality rate, you can imagine the fatality rates of other places. It is fair to compare the PRC with other East Asian countries. Japan, S. Korea, and TW are exemplary - high vigilance, high vax rates, and orderly opening, so they have much lower excess death rates than most other countries. If t
Read more

Thoughts on the Rashist slaughter in Ukraine

Image
I started to write down these thoughts in February 2023 before my second trip to Ukraine, paused for many months, picked it up intermittently in the summer, and finally finished on Saturday, September 23, 2023. I will not edit this post because I want to come back to it to see how my views will change or remain in the future. It has been a long and brutal 19 months since the Moscow KGB thug launched the slaughter in Ukraine.  My views on this war are simple and straightforward, not much different from freedom lovers who stand with free people fighting for their freedom. I wanted to provide some background. I have some slight differences from others that make me treat certain things slightly differently. Why I support the Ukrainians' fight for their freedom I firmly support people fighting for their freedom regardless of their political leaning (left, right, or center), race, or religion (Buddhists in Tibet, Christians in Ukraine, Muslims in Xinjiang, Iran, and Afghanistan). To me,
Read more